Search Results for "MHADA land"

281 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 281 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 37(1AA) of MRTP Act in Constitutional Validity Case. Court Holds That State's Power to Modify Development Plans Does Not Violate 74th Amendment or Article 243W.

The petitioners, residents of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Official Trustee's Petition Seeking Restriction of FSI in Trust Property Development. Consent Order Did Not Limit FSI to 2294 Sq.Ft. as Claimed by Petitioner.

The Official Trustee, Maharashtra State, filed a petition seeking directions and clarification of an order dated 8.8.1997 passed in Trust Petition No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Room for Want of Sanctioned Plan; Assessment Records and Repair Permissions Held Insufficient to Prove Legality of Construction.

The petitioner, a 72-year-old senior citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Dispute Over Title Cannot Be Decided in Revenue Proceedings Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, ten individuals claiming to be the legal heirs of one Ganpat Surpame, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute. Developer Granted Interim Relief to Take Possession of Tenements from Non-Cooperating Members Pending Arbitration Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, M/s. R.R.B. Realtors Pvt. Ltd., a real estate developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...