Search Results for "Karnataka State Law University"

617 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 617 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Regularization of MDS Admission for Student Affected by Technical Glitch in CAP Process. Clause 8.3 of Information Brochure for MDS NEET Invoked to Regularize Admission and Permit Examination.

The petitioner, Ms. Shaikh Afreen Nooruddin, a student, filed a writ petition seeking regularization of her admission to the MDS (Master of Dental Sur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Recognize Admissions for Increased Intake in Ayurvedic College. Admissions to increased intake capacity must be made through centralized process as per AYUSH rules, not unilaterally by the institution.

The petitioner, Prakash Shikshan Mandal's Loknete Rajaram Bapu Patil Ayurvedic Medical College, Islampur, through its Vice Principal Dr. Ranjit Shamra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Professor's Writ Petition Seeking Retirement Age of 65 Years. Petitioner's claim for extension of service based on UGC/ICAR Regulations and MHRD letter rejected as University had not adopted the revised age of superannuation.

The petitioner, Dr. Andani Gowda, was a Professor of Agronomy at the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru. He filed a writ petition under Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Daily Wage Employees Against Agricultural University for Illegal Termination. Termination of Daily Wage Cooks Without Notice or Compensation Held Illegal Due to Non-Disclosure of Temporary Nature of Employment.

The petitioners, Arun Rambhau Phatak and Sarjirao Mahadeo Bhalerao, were daily wage helpers to cooks at Mahatma Phule Krushi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, from ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Section 64 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Barring Legal Practitioners from Appearing Before College Tribunal. Section 64 is Not Repugnant to Advocates Act, 1961 as Section 30 Thereof is Not in Force and Tribunal is Not a Court.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging Section 64 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, which bars legal practitioners from appeari...