Search Results for "Juvenile Justice Act 2015"

240 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 240 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 452, 506 IPC set aside as medical evidence and witness testimony failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashok @ Bhaiyya s/o Magan Koli, was convicted by the trial court under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Abduction, Murder, Robbery, and Conspiracy. The Appellants Contended That Lodging Two FIRs for the Same Transaction Vitiated the Trial and That Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals against a common judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 50/2009, which convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Two Brothers in IT Act Case — IPC Offences Not Maintainable in Light of Section 67 of IT Act. Non-obstante clause in Section 81 of IT Act overrides IPC for offences involving obscene electronic material, following Sharat Babu Digumarti v. Government (NCT of Delhi).

The petitioners, two brothers, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2018 registered at Shahupuri Police Station, Kolhapur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Consent-Based Sexual Relationship Not Rape Under Section 375 IPC as Promise of Marriage Was Not False from Inception.

The appellant, Amit Shende, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Illegal Sentence Below Minimum and Unreliable Identification. Conviction under Section 397 IPC set aside as sentence of four years is below the mandatory minimum of seven years and identification by streetlight at 4:30 a.m. was doubtful.

The applicant, Rahul Guruprasad Mishra, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Mumbai, in Sessions Case No.403 of 2013 for an offence punishab...