Search Results for "Indian Evidence Act privilege"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Indian Evidence Act privilege"

178 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 178 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Court holds that failure to pay costs as directed by the court results in dismissal of the appeal under Section 100 CPC.

19 Dec 2025

The State of Karnataka and its officers filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs States to Ensure Basic Toilet Facilities in All Court Premises Under Article 21 — Right to Dignity Includes Access to Sanitation. The Court held that the right to life under Article 21 encompasses the right to sanitation, and the State must provide and maintain clean, accessible toilets for all genders including transgender persons and persons with disabilities in all court complexes.

17 Feb 2025

The petitioner, a practicing advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions to all States and Un...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Malafide Prosecution. Allegations of Rape on False Promise of Marriage Found Baseless as Relationship Was Consensual and Complaint Filed After Civil Dispute.

30 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Arunkumar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) and Section 528 of the Bharatiya...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Married Woman in Kidnapping Case — Petitioner Not Named in FIR and No Prima Facie Case of Kidnapping for Ransom Established Under Section 364A IPC. The court exercised discretion under Section 438 CrPC to grant pre-arrest bail subject to conditions, emphasizing that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and the allegations did not prima facie constitute the offence of kidnapping for ransom.

18 Jun 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Bhavani Revanna, a married woman hailing from a family with undeniable political background, filed a petition under Section 438 o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Anticipatory Bail in Dowry Case, Emphasizes Distinction Between Power to Arrest and Justification for Arrest. The court set aside the High Court's order rejecting anticipatory bail and directing surrender, holding that the High Court failed to consider that the charge-sheet had been filed and the appellant had cooperated with investigation.

26 Jul 2023

The appellant, Md. Asfak Alam, was married to the second respondent on 5 November 2020. Alleging interference by the wife's father, the appellant lodg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Orders Return of Security in Admiralty Suit for Lack of Sister Ship Relationship. Security furnished for arbitration claim cannot be retained when the vessel arrested is not a sister ship of the vessel for which services were provided.

21 Feb 2014

The plaintiff, Condor Maritime Dienstleistung GmbH & Co. KG, filed an admiralty suit against m.v. Western Light and its owners (defendants) claiming m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Injunction Set Aside Due to Vague Pleadings and Lack of Prima Facie Case. The court held that without proper proof of trademark ownership and clear pleadings, an interim injunction cannot be granted under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

21 Sep 2013

The case involves an appeal against an interim injunction granted by the Principal District Judge, Pune, restraining the appellants from using the tra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Health Insurance Renewal Petitions Against United India Insurance Company — Insurer Cannot Refuse Renewal Based on Pre-existing Disease Exclusion After Continuous Coverage Under Group Policy. The court held that the exclusion clause for pre-existing diseases applies only at the inception of the first policy and not at renewal, and that refusal to renew was arbitrary.

19 Aug 2013

The petitioners, account holders of Bank of Maharashtra, were covered under a group health insurance scheme called 'Mahabank Swasthya Yojna' provided ...

16 17 18

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)