Search Results for "Heritage property"

200 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 200 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 17A of PC Act — FIR Registered Without Prior Approval from Competent Authority for Investigation Against Public Servant

The petitioner, Ningappa G @ Ningappa Savant, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) / Section 52...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State's Refusal to Modify Development Plan Reservation. State's Discretion to Revert Land to Original Reservation Upheld Under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Ramchandra Tukaram Mohite (since deceased through legal representatives), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Advocate in RTI Dispute — No Offence Under Sections 353, 323, 504, 506 IPC Made Out. Allegations of Obstruction of Public Servant Fail as Informant Not Discharging Public Duty at Time of Incident.

The applicant, a practicing advocate, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010026042017_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging Tree Felling Permission for Mopa Airport Project. Appellate Authority's Order Under Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 Upheld as Reasoned and Not Suffering from Non-Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Federation of Rainbow Warriors, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a Public Interest Litigation be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Petition in Testamentary Suit No. 13 of 1994 — Will Not Proved Due to Suspicious Circumstances. Propounders Failed to Discharge Burden of Proving Due Execution Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The plaintiffs, Harish Vithal Kulkarni and Shivanand Vishwanath Warty, claiming to be executors under a Will dated 11th October, 1991 of Mahadeo Sabni...