Search Results for "Floor Area Ratio"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Floor Area Ratio"

730 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 730 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Reserves Decision on Quashing of Multiple FIRs in Real Estate Dispute; Developers Contend Breach of Contract, Not Cheating. Court Examines Whether Civil Dispute Can Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406 and 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

21 Oct 2024

The Karnataka High Court heard a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of mult...

High Court

High Court Examines Whether Minister Can Drop Land Acquisition After Award and Dismissal of Landowner’s Challenge. Matter Concerns Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Power of Acquiring Authority to Object.

6 Oct 2017

The petitioner, City & Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), acting as the New Town's Development Authority under the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Ministerial Order Reversing Market Fee Demand Under APMC Act. Imported Edible Oil Transaction Raises Questions of Agency and Marketing Under Section 31 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

20 Jul 2015

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by the Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee against the order of th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. The Petitions, Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, Sought to Quash Preliminary Notification Dated 21.05.2008 Under Section 17(1) and (3) of BDA Act and Final Notification Dated 18.02.2010 Under Section 19(1).

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Octroi Levy on Imported Aircraft Parts in Customs Bonded Warehouse — Entry into Municipal Limits Occurs Upon Removal from Warehouse. Interpretation of 'Goods' and 'Entry' Under Section 192 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Confirms Levy is Valid and Not Ultra Vires.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Jet Airways (India) Ltd. and Reliance Commercial Dealers Ltd. challenging the levy of octroi by the ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Builder's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Partly Quashing Stop Construction Notice and Directing Objections Under KIAD Act. The Full Bench Reserves Judgment on 06-02-2014, but the Final Decision is Not Available in the Provided Incomplete Text.

11 Apr 2014

The case involves writ appeals filed by M/s Century Central, a registered partnership firm, challenging the order dated 02/07/2013 passed by a learned...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Constitutional Validity of Section 41D of Bombay Sales Tax Act Inserted by Maharashtra Act XVI of 1995. Petitioners Challenge Retrospective Withdrawal of Sales Tax Deferral Incentives Under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1983, as Ultra Vires Constitution and Violative of Promissory Estoppel.

20 Aug 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Trust Scheme Dispute, Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration of Hereditary Trusteeship Claims. The Court held that the District Judge erred in remanding the matter without considering the merits of the scheme application and the rights of legal heirs under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950.

9 Oct 2019

The appellants, original applicants in Scheme Application No. 17 of 1987, sought framing of a scheme for the public trust 'Hazrat Sayyad Dalal @ Shaik...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order Directing Civil Imprisonment for Breach of Temporary Injunction Under Order XXXIX Rule 2(A) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Lower Court Found That Appellants Violated Injunction by Completing Construction and Creating Third-Party Interests Despite Court Restraints.

9 Mar 2005

This appeal from order arose from a contempt application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 2(A) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The original plaintif...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Frames Points for Consideration in Regular First Appeal Against Dismissal of Recovery Suit in Construction Contract Dispute. Plaintiffs Claimed Excess Payment and Defective Work; Court's Final Order Not Available in Provided Text.

19 Sep 2019

Background: The dispute concerned a construction contract for a residential house in Bangalore. The plaintiffs (appellants) were the owners who had en...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)