Search Results for "Flat Allotment"

368 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 368 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Amendment of Plaint in Property Dispute — No New Cause of Action Introduced. Amendment seeking to add details of alternate accommodation agreement and electricity disconnection allowed as it clarifies existing claim without changing the nature of the suit.

The petitioner, Ravi Ashish Builders Ltd, challenged an order dated 10th September 2018 passed by the learned trial judge allowing Chamber Summons No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Will Dispute Case — High Court's Reversal of Trial Court's Preliminary Decree Set Aside. Registered Will Fails to Meet Attestation Requirements Under Section 63(c) of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

The case concerns a dispute over a tenement originally allotted to Suhagwanti Devi, the wife of late Harbans Lal, under a redevelopment scheme. After ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Order Returning Plaint in Property Dispute — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred Under Section 163 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Dispute Relating to Property Owned by Cooperative Society Must Be Tried by Cooperative Court, Not Civil Court.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Sanjivani Kailas Borade (applicant) challenging an order of the District Judge-1, Solapur, dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Shifting Agreements in MHADA Redevelopment Project — Collector of Stamps Lacked Review Power and Agreements Were for Temporary Shifting, Not Permanent Alternate Accommodation Under Article 25(d) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The Petitioner, Guruashish Construction Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, entered into a tripartite Joint Development Agreement dated 10 April 2008 ...