Search Results for "Duty Entitlement Pass Book"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Challenged Victim. Mental Age of Adult with Cerebral Palsy Considered for Applicability of Special Procedures under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

The case concerned a criminal appeal by the prosecutrix, a 38-year-old woman suffering from cerebral palsy (R. Hemiparesis), through her mother. An FI...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes State Order Permitting Non-Forest Use of Reserved Forest Without Central Approval. Section 28 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 Cannot Override Section 2 of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.

The petitioner, Gireesh Achar, filed a public interest litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order of Status Quo and Appointment of Receiver in Property Dispute. Court Holds That Suit for Declaration and Injunction Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata and That Receiver Cannot Be Removed Without Proper Application.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (Afzal Khan and others) against the appellants (Mehboob Ayub Khan and others) seeking declarati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Receiver's Appointment in Embezzlement Suit. Third Party Claimants Not Party to Suit Cannot Have Receiver Appointed Over Their Properties Without Trial.

The appeal arose from an order dated 5th September 2019 passed by a learned Single Judge (R.I. Chagla J.) on a motion filed by the original plaintiff ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Property Declaration Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellants failed to prove title and possession; no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC.

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals (R.F.A.No.784/2013 and R.F.A.No.785/2013) filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the C...