Search Results for "Counter claim"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Counter claim"

3405 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3405 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal by Son in Ancestral Property Dispute — Daughters' Claim for Partition Upheld as Coparcenary Property Includes Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court affirmed that daughters are coparceners by birth and entitled to equal share in ancestral property, rejecting the brother's claim of adverse possession.

17 Dec 2019

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the second defendant in a partition suit (O.S.No.13/2011) before the Senior Civil Judge, Bhalki. The...

High Court

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1543 OF 2014

21 Jun 2018

The matter arose from a stock trading dispute between Keynote Capitals Ltd. (a trading member of the National Stock Exchange) and Eco Recycling Ltd. (...

High Court

KAHC010220972024_1

20 Jul 2026

These commercial appeals under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Plaintiffs' Appeal Against Impleadment of Subsequent Purchasers as Defendants in Civil Suit - Sets Aside High Court and Trial Court Orders. Court Held That Plaintiffs Are Dominus Litis and Cannot Be Compelled to Implead Defendants Against Their Wish Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, Though Non-Impleadment Is at Plaintiffs' Risk Regarding Counter-Claim.

16 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising from a property dispute where the appellants (original plaintiffs) had filed Civil Suit No. 298/2011 fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Redevelopment Dispute – Plaintiff Seeks Eviction of Remaining Occupants under Development Agreement. Court Addresses Whether Non-Cooperating Occupants Can Be Compelled to Vacate Pending Suit Where Majority Have Already Vacated.

16 Oct 2025

This matter arises from an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Ambit Life Style Homes LLP, in a suit for enforcement of a registered developme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Findings on Loan vs. Capital Contribution and Rejection of Counterclaim as Not Maintainable. The court held that the arbitrator's findings were based on evidence and not perverse, and the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 failed.

23 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Shekhar Appu Shetty, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dat...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Civil Revision Application Against Condonation of Delay and Restoration of Suit for Specific Performance Dismissed in Default. The Trial Court's Order Condoning Delay of 5 Years 9 Months and Restoring Suit Under Order IX Rule 9 CPC is Challenged on the Ground of Bar to Second Restoration Application.

14 Aug 2013

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance (Spl.C.S. No.74/1997) filed by the respondent’s father (since deceased) against the revision ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Procedural Order on Discovery — Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Permit Challenge to Procedural Orders, Only Final Awards.

18 Nov 2010

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Tata Industries Limited and another against Gras...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Broadcast Rights Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 4.77 Crore with Interest. Arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

31 Aug 2012

The Petitioner, Maharashtra Film Stage and Cultural Development Corporation Ltd., a Government of Maharashtra corporation, challenged an Arbitral Awar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement and Counter Claim in Suit Filed Before 2002 CPC Amendment. Order 6 Rule 17 as amended by 2002 Amendment Act does not apply to suits instituted before 1.7.2002.

29 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Sumita Pradipkumar Dixit, challenged an order dated 29.8.2009 passed by the trial court in RC Suit No. 187/1999, which rejected her ap...

16 17 18 19 20

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)