Search Results for "Contractual Engagement"

264 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 264 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Termination Upheld as Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days of Continuous Service. Labour Court's Finding of Fact Not Perverse, No Interference Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Keru Kisan Rokade, was initially appointed on a temporary basis by the respondent, Geoffery Manners & Co. Ltd., Nasik. Although his ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court reviews dismissal of writ petition in EPF liability case concerning cooperative bank and pigmy agents. Bank challenges applicability of Indian Banks Association precedent to EPF Act context.

The Pachora Peoples' Cooperative Bank Ltd. filed a Review Application seeking to recall the order dated 07.02.2014 passed in Writ Petition No.5086/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Rejection of Appeal Against Oral Termination. Petitioner's Long Service Without Appointment Order Does Not Justify Automatic Termination; Management Must Follow Due Process.

The petitioner, Shailesh Anand Kulkarni, was appointed on 8.9.2001 as a Computer Science teacher by the Khandesh College Education Society, which runs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Bank in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement of Daily Wager Denied Due to Lack of Continuous Service. Employee failed to prove 240 days of continuous service in preceding year, disentitling him to protection under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the Nagpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (the appellant) challenging the judgment of a learne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal Against Reinstatement of Workmen Under Industrial Dispute Act. Held that termination without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal and workmen are entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

The case involves an appeal filed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) and its officer against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Remands for Fresh Determination on Disability and Wages. Commissioner's order set aside for failure to consider relevant evidence and apply correct legal principles under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

The appeal was filed by the Shipping Corporation of India Limited, the employer, under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, challenging...