High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions by Bar/Restaurant Licensees Against Non-Renewal of CL-9 Excise Licenses. Petitions Challenge Communications Issued by Excise Authorities and Seek Directions to Renew Licenses.
22 Aug 2017...
Search Results for "Construction Restriction"
1199 result(s) found
Found 1199 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounces Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 295 Amendment and Demand for Unearned Income Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The Lead Petition Involved Assignment of Leasehold Rights and a Demand of Over Rs. 94 Crores, With the Petitioners Alleging the Retrospective Amendment Violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).
3 May 2018The judgment pertained to a batch of four writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Ordinary O...
- 60
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Immediate Halt to Stubble Burning and Construction Activities in Delhi-NCR to Combat Air Pollution — Violation of Article 21 Right to Life. The Court held that failure of state governments and local authorities to prevent pollution-causing activities violates the right to life and makes them liable for tortious acts and contempt of court.
4 Nov 2019The Supreme Court was hearing interlocutory applications in the ongoing M.C. Mehta v. Union of India writ petition concerning environmental pollution,...
- 234
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
3 Dec 2015The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.
30 Nov -0001The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...
- 175
High Court
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds MEP Notification for Iron Ore and Steel Products as Valid Exercise of Power Under Foreign Trade Act. Court holds that Minimum Export Price is a reasonable condition for export licensing and does not violate fundamental rights.
25 Jan 2016The petitioners, JSW Steel Limited and Welspun Tradings Limited, along with their officers, challenged the constitutional validity of the Minimum Expo...
- 101
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.
22 Apr 2020The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...
- 217
High Court
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment in Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Jamma Malai Lands as Forest Land. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Conservator of Forests' Order Forfeiting Rights Under Section 82 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, Alleging Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Earlier Judicial Decrees.
17 Feb 2026The writ petition challenged the order dated 16.12.2011 passed by the Conservator of Forests, Kodagu, declaring the petitioners' Jamma Malai lands as ...
- 37
