CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 112 OF 2012
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Collusive Decree"
244 result(s) found
Found 244 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 100 CPC as the Defendant Failed to Show Perversity in the Findings of Fact.
8 Dec 2014The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendant in a suit for specific performance. The original plaintiff had filed OS 198/1991 for specific...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Adoption Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Nullity Upheld. Adoption of Minor by Widow Without Husband's Consent and Without Registered Deed Held Void Under Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956.
13 Apr 2023The appellant, Basavaraj alias Shivabasappa, a minor represented by his natural father, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil P...
- 145
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Adverse Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant failed to prove adverse possession for over 12 years as required under Section 65 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.
10 Jun 2016The appellant, Virupakshappa, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decre...
- 109
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below concurrently found that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.
26 Jul 2022The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiffs, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agains...
- 144
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Dispute Over Agricultural Land and Family Arrangement. Court holds that a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC is maintainable against an order refusing to amend written statement, and that amendment seeking to incorporate a family arrangement and counterclaim should be allowed to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, original defendants in a suit for declaration and permanent injunction, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the C...
- 47
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Objector's Applications in Execution Proceedings — Held That Executing Court Must Determine Rights of Third Party Objector Under Order 21 Rules 97-101 CPC Before Proceeding with Possession. The court set aside the order dismissing I.A.Nos.7 to 11 and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
18 Oct 2021The appellant, M. Venkatachalam, was an objector in execution proceedings (Ex.No.1863/2015) arising out of a decree in O.S.No.2781/2001. The decree ho...
- 130
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Plaintiff’s Appeal in Hindu Succession Case — Doctrine of Pious Obligation Applied to Tamil Vannian Christians. Endorsee of Promissory Note Entitled to Sue Non-Executant Coparceners Where Endorsement Transfers Debt under Hindu Law
6 Oct 1969The dispute arose out of a suit for partition and declaration filed by the appellant (plaintiff), the son of the eighth defendant, against the first r...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Appellant Fails to Prove Agreement to Sell. Trial court's finding that no agreement was executed and no advance paid upheld; appeal dismissed with costs.
12 Mar 2015The appellant, Mr. Jagadish Poonja, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.
12 Mar 2014The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...
- 147
