Search Results for "CIDCO land"

244 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 244 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Limitation is a Mixed Question of Law and Facts Not Decided at Threshold Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The present civil revision application was filed by the original defendant No.1 in Regular Civil Suit No.1600/2012 pending before the 16th Civil Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Delivers Judgment in Writ Petition Challenging Revocation of Slaughter Licenses by Municipal Corporation; Questions of Arbitrariness and Natural Justice Violation Examined Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The Bombay Suburban Khatik Association, an association of butchers and mutton vendors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Driver's Invalid License, with Right to Recover from Owner. Third-party liability upheld under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, applying 'pay and recover' principle.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Babulal Somani and Rukhamanibai, parents of the deceased, who died in a vehicular accident involv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Draft Development Plan and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. General Body Resolution Modifying Draft Plan Upheld as Legislative Function; Ex Post Facto Extension Held Permissible.

This judgment arose from writ petitions filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging the notification dated 4 February 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12%. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach and damages are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Agarsons Container Terminals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral...