Search Results for "Article 300-A"

350 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 350 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Case Under National Highways Act, 1956. The court upheld landowners' entitlement to solatium and interest, rejecting arguments based on corrected financial burden estimates as insufficient grounds for review.

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a Review Petition filed by the Appellants seeking recall of its earlier order in Tarsem Singh-II, which had dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.

The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Seeking DRC in BBMP Land Acquisition Case — Petitioners Failed to Establish Entitlement to Development Rights Certificate Under KTCP Act, 1961.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Oath-Based Verification of Income Tax Demand. Petitioner's request for respondent to submit claim under oath rejected as not maintainable under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Prof. P.N. Shetty, filed a writ petition under Article 226 read with Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India, seeking direct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Show-Cause Notice Under Customs Act — No Interference at Pre-Adjudication Stage. Section 28(11) of Customs Act, 1962 Upheld as Valid and Compensatory in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s. Royaloak Furniture India LLP, a furniture importer, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA's 10-Year Transfer Ban on Rehab Tenements as Unconstitutional and Ultra Vires. Condition in NOC restricting sale/transfer of tenancy rights for ten years from occupation held to be without statutory authority and violative of Article 300A of the Constitution.

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions challenging a condition imposed by the Mumbai Building Repairs & Reconstruction Board (a unit of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Tower Construction on Agricultural Land Without Consent. Landowners' Rights Under Article 300A of the Constitution Upheld Against State's Unilateral Action.

The petitioners, Kishor s/o Ravindra Zope, Pradip s/o Ravindra Zope, and Pushpabai (Punyabai) w/o Ravindra Zope, are agriculturists residing in Warang...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Amusement Park Admission Fee. Lumpsum Charge for Entry and Entertainment is Subject to Duty Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioners, Pan India Paryatan Limited and its director, owned and operated an amusement park in Greater Bombay which opened to the public on 25t...