Search Results for "Article 227 CPC"

867 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 867 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order to Implead Legal Representatives in Partition Suit — Petitioner Failed to Show Prejudice or Abuse of Process.

The petitioner, Smt. Hanamavva, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 18.06.2026 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Permitting Additional Written Statement with Inconsistent Stand in Eviction Suit. Change of Status from Co-sharer to Tenant Held Impermissible Under Order 8 Rule 9 CPC as It Introduces a Totally Inconsistent and Contradictory Stand.

The appeal arises from a civil suit for eviction filed by the plaintiff, Mondira Ghosh, against the defendant, Chaitali Ghosh, in the City Civil Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Share Pledge and Corporate Guarantee — Holds That Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Favored Appellant for Injunction Against Enforcement of Personal Guarantees and Share Pledge Pending Arbitration.

The appellant, Palmview Investments Overseas Limited, a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, filed an appeal against an order of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Deletion of Issues and Rejection of Section 151 Application. Court holds that Order XIV Rule 5 CPC allows deletion of issues at any stage and Section 151 CPC cannot be used to circumvent specific provisions like Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

The case involves a property dispute over CB-97, Naraina Village, Delhi Cantt. The appellants (defendants in the suit) challenged two orders of the De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment and Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order in Service Charges Dispute. Applicant Company Held to be Necessary Party as Successor-in-Interest of Defendant Firm Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioners, Tarun Keshrichand Shah and Priyalata Keshrichand Shah, filed a suit (Suit No. 6117 of 2007) against M/s. Kishore Engineering Co. (res...