Search Results for "Article 201"

1434 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1434 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Bail Applications of Accused Persons in Murder Case Registered at Kamakshipalya Police Station. Petitioners, Accused of Offences Including Murder and Kidnapping, Seek Regular Bail After Rejection by Sessions Court Under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (and Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal from Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused for Murder and Destruction of Evidence After Establishing Deceased's Identity Through DNA Test.

The appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Shimoga, in S.C. No.95/2012 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder, Acquits Others in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC sustained for accused who inflicted fatal injuries, while others acquitted for insufficient proof of common intention.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by convicted accused and a criminal application by the State seeking leave to appeal against acqui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Arms Act Offences. Accused challenges eyewitness testimony, FSL report discrepancy, and claims benefit of grave and sudden provocation under Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal appeal filed by the accused challenging his conviction and sentence dated 07.09.2016 by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Robbery and Murder Case. Circumstantial evidence and test identification parade found insufficient to convict accused No.2 under Sections 392, 302, 468, 201 read with 34 IPC.

This criminal appeal arose from the acquittal of the second accused by the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in Sessions Case No.724...