Search Results for "Arbitrary enhancement"

242 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 242 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Non-Speaking Order Under Section 17(5) of Customs Act — Directs Speaking Order Within Two Weeks. Failure to Pass Speaking Order After Payment Under Protest Violates Statutory Mandate.

The petitioner, JKC General Trading Company, a partnership firm, imported goods and was assessed customs duty by the respondents. The petitioner paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Bank of India's Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Dispute Referred to Arbitration Despite Respondent's Claim of Non-Signatory Status, with Jurisdictional Issue Left to Arbitrator.

The judgment arises from a petition filed by Bank of India under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Corrigendum in Tender Matter for Arbitrary Enhancement of Eligibility Criteria. GST Certificate Requirement Increased from 1 Year to 3 Years Without Justification, Violating Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Rajath R., proprietor of R.R. Enterprises, challenged a corrigendum issued on 08.04.2022 by the State of Karnataka, Health and Family ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Lease Rent Demand Against Indian Oil Corporation for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Collector's demand for arrears of lease rent for periods prior to 1995 set aside as time-barred and without authority under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, challenged a communication dated 14 March 2002 from the Collector, Mumbai Suburban District, demanding...