High Court of Karnataka Quashes Corrigendum in Tender Matter for Arbitrary Enhancement of Eligibility Criteria. GST Certificate Requirement Increased from 1 Year to 3 Years Without Justification, Violating Article 14 of the Constitution.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 71
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rajath R., proprietor of R.R. Enterprises, challenged a corrigendum issued on 08.04.2022 by the State of Karnataka, Health and Family Welfare Department, which modified the eligibility criteria for a tender for supply of food and diet to government hospitals in Ramanagara. The original NIT dated 31.03.2022 required bidders to have a GST certificate of at least one year. The petitioner, who had been supplying food to the District Hospital since 2021, applied and was eligible. However, the corrigendum increased the requirement to three years, thereby disqualifying the petitioner. The court heard arguments from both sides and found that the modification was arbitrary and without any justification. The court held that the corrigendum was unreasonable and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. Consequently, the court quashed the corrigendum and directed the respondents to proceed with the tender process based on the original NIT conditions. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Tender Process - Arbitrariness - Article 14 of the Constitution of India - The court examined whether a corrigendum enhancing the GST certificate requirement from one year to three years was arbitrary. Held that the modification was unreasonable and without any rationale, thereby violating Article 14. (Paras 4-6)

B) Tender Law - Corrigendum - Modification of Eligibility Criteria - The court considered the validity of a corrigendum issued after the NIT, which increased the GST registration period from one year to three years. Held that such modification, which effectively excluded the petitioner who had already submitted a bid, was arbitrary and liable to be quashed. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the corrigendum issued by the respondent enhancing the GST certificate requirement from one year to three years is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the corrigendum dated 08.04.2022 and directed the respondents to proceed with the tender process in accordance with the original NIT dated 31.03.2022. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Tender conditions must be reasonable and non-arbitrary
  • Corrigendum altering eligibility criteria after bid submission is impermissible
  • Article 14 applies to tender processes
  • GST registration requirement must be proportionate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (11) 3

WP No. 8902 of 2022 (GM-TEN)

2022-11-09

M. Nagaprasanna

D. S. Hosmath for petitioner, M. Vinod Kumar for respondents

Rajath R.

State of Karnataka, Director of Health and Family Welfare Department, District Surgeon

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a corrigendum to a tender notice.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the corrigendum dated 08.04.2022 and costs.

Filing Reason

The corrigendum increased the GST certificate requirement from one year to three years, thereby disqualifying the petitioner who had already submitted a bid.

Issues

Whether the corrigendum enhancing the GST certificate requirement from one year to three years is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the corrigendum was arbitrary and unreasonable, as it changed the eligibility criteria after the NIT was issued, thereby excluding the petitioner who had already applied. Respondents argued that the corrigendum was issued to ensure that only experienced bidders participate.

Ratio Decidendi

A corrigendum that arbitrarily modifies eligibility criteria after the NIT is issued, without any rationale, is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and is liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the corrigendum issued on 08.04.2022 to the Notice Inviting Tender dated 31.03.2022, by which, the right of the petitioner to participate in the tender is taken away. The GST certificate earlier stood at one year, which is by way of said corrigendum is increased to 3 years. The modification is unreasonable and without any rationale. It is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India on an unspecified date. The petition came up for preliminary hearing on 09.11.2022, and the court made the order.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Corrigendum in Tender Matter for Arbitrary Enhancement of Eligibility Criteria. GST Certificate Requirement Increased from 1 Year to 3 Years Without Justification, Violating Article 14 of the Constitution.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS ter...