Search Results for "Airlines"

227 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 227 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Retracted Statement Not Considered. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Retraction of Confession.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Iqbal Yusuf Suleman, challenged the detention order dated 20.4.2004 passed by the detaining authority under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC Application in Suit for Specific Performance. Court Holds That Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application and a Writ Petition filed by M/s J.M. Baxi & Co. (the applicant/petitioner) challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Execution Proceedings for Decree Holder. Delay of 13 Years in Filing Execution Application Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown for Non-Filing Due to Pendency of Appeal and Other Proceedings.

The petitioner, M/s. Botanium Limited (now merged in Go Airlines (India) Limited), was the decree holder in Regular Civil Suit No. 292 of 1983. The su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 Notice. Failure to Inform Appellant of Right to Search Before Magistrate or Gazetted Officer Renders Recovery of Contraband Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Ms. Naomi Banda, a Zambian national, was convicted by a Special Judge under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR in Arms Act Case Due to Lack of Intent and Knowledge of Possession of Live Bullet. The court held that without conscious possession and intent, prosecution under Section 25(1B) of the Arms Act, 1959, is unsustainable.

The petitioner, Tamas Sen, a 26-year-old Senior Sales Manager at Honeywell International India Private Limited, was traveling on official business fro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...