Search Results for "circumstantial evidence"

4030 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4030 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Brother's Murder in Property Dispute Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Tulshidas Gaude, was convicted by the Sessions Court at Panaji in Sessions Case No.31/2010 for the murder of his brother, Sanjay Gaude,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under UAPA and IPC for Terrorist Conspiracy and Murder. Conspiracy to Kill Rationalist Activist Proved Through Circumstantial Evidence and Confession of Co-Accused.

The appellant, Mirza Himayat Beig @ Umar, was convicted by the trial court for offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 452, 342 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Akram Khalil Ahmed Inamdar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of Farukh Shaikh under Sections 302,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence fails as prosecution unable to prove chain of circumstances leading to guilt.

The appellant, Sanjay Pundlik Parkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sawantwadi, in Sessions Case No. 3 of 1991 for the murder of his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Wife in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Theft. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing husband's nephew by poisoning sustained as chain of circumstances complete.

The appellant, Suvarna Jyotiram Chavan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli for the murder of her husband's nephew, Pratik (aged 3 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction based on motive and last seen theory fails as prosecution witnesses turned hostile and medical evidence inconsistent with alleged weapon.

The appellant, Kashiram Ravaji Mene, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Sessions Case No.4 of 2003 for the murder of his sister-in-law...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder of Wife in Dowry Demand Case. Circumstantial evidence including demand of Rs. 50,000 for auto rickshaw and cruelty led to conviction under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Balaji Maruti Londhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for the murder of his wife Ranjana under Section 302 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shaukat Ali Mohammed Hussein Shaikh, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai in Sessions Case No. 155 ...