Search Results for "Magistrate's permission"

1896 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1896 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Material Contradictions. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dilip Namdeo Gade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for the murder of Pushpa Nakade under Section 302 IPC an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Section 187 MV Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Dyaniyal S/o Malku Army, was convicted by the Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Humnabad in C.C. No. 309/2019 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Dispute Following Compromise and Divorce. The court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings under Sections 498A and 504 IPC as the parties had settled and obtained a divorce by mutual consent.

The applicant, Bhavika Manoj Sonar, filed a criminal complaint against her husband, Manoj Narendra Sonar, under Sections 498A and 504 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Possession of the Acquired Land Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Fakhruddin s/o Hyderali (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Mustafa Fakhruddin Ambawala) challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Advocate for Disrupting Court Proceedings. Advocate's Rowdy Behavior and Improper Language in Court Amounts to Prima Facie Criminal Contempt Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The High Court of Bombay, on its own motion, initiated contempt proceedings against Mr. N.B. Deshmukh, an advocate, based on an incident that occurred...