Search Results for "corresponding provision"

2265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Accidental Fall Not Suicide. Death of a passenger falling from a train and being run over is an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway is liable for compensation under Section 124-A.

The present appeal was filed by the appellants, Ramesh Laxmanrao Dighade and Mrs. Sindhu w/o Ramesh Dighade, being aggrieved by the judgment and award...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Minor Penalty on Government Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Unauthorized Absence. Withholding of One Increment for Two Years Held Proportional Under Rule 11(iv) of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.

The petitioner, Mr. Hanamatrao M. Kulkarni, was a Junior Engineer (Electrical) in the Electricity Department, Government of Goa, recruited in 1983. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Shareholder Dispute Over Share Transfer Agreement — Agreement dated 14th June 2019 Held Valid and Enforceable.

The dispute arises out of a Share Purchase Agreement dated 14th June 2019 between the Kamdar Group (appellants) and the Sanghvi Group (respondents) fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Favor of Appellants in Commercial Suits Involving Secured Creditors. Appointment of receiver without notice and without considering secured creditors' rights under SARFAESI Act is unsustainable.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by Future Corporate Resources Pvt Ltd and Ojas Tradelease And Mall Management Pvt Ltd against or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Meeting Without Rally in Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Permission for Vishal Maharally. Court directs respondents to consider fresh application for public meeting within 24 hours, without expressing opinion on refusal of rally permission.

The petitioners, Bharat Mukti Morcha (a social organization) and its member Anil Nagare, sought to hold a 'Vishal Maharally' (giant rally) of persons ...