Search Results for "witness restriction"

683 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 683 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred Inside Factory, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(10) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the judgment and order dated 10.05.2012 passed by the learned Special Judge (Atrocity), Mahesana, in Special (At...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 136 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove theft beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kenchanna, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in Spl. C. No.285/2008 for an offence punishable under Section 136...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unexplained Delay. Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Contradicts Allegation of Forcible Rape Under Section 376 IPC.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment dated 25.04.2003 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Rape and Murder of Minor. Conviction Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted Due to Lack of Aggravating Circumstances.

The appellant, Ravishankar @ Baba Vishwakarma, was convicted by the Trial Court for kidnapping, raping, and murdering a 13-year-old girl, and for dest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sewakdas Tukaram Jumde, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Abetment to Suicide Case — No Evidence of Instigation or Intent. Allegations of harassment and instigation under Sections 306, 354, 323, 504 IPC read with Section 34 IPC not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment of acquittal dated 22.07.2017 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haveri (si...