Search Results for "vacate premises"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "vacate premises"

908 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 908 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in Rent Control Case for Abuse of Process and Overreaching Court Orders. Eviction order under Section 21(2) of U.P. Urban Premises Rent Control Ordinance, 2021 was final and binding, and restoration application challenging it after Supreme Court dismissal constituted abuse, with costs imposed and show cause notice issued to authority for contempt.

25 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a tenant challenging eviction orders under the U.P. Urban Premises Rent Control Ordinance, 2021. The landlord initiated proceedin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Mesne Profits Award in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Rate Fixed at Rs.1,24,099 per Month Based on Expert Evidence. Court Confirms That Mesne Profits Are Determined by Market Rent, Not Controlled Rent, and Interest at 6% p.a. Is Appropriate.

19 Jan 2024

The case involves a dispute between Bata India Limited (the applicant/tenant) and Bindiya Co-operative Housing Society Limited (the respondent/landlor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Damages Award in Landlord-Tenant Dispute, Reduces Decretal Amount for Cooperative Society Tenant. The Court balanced equities by reducing the monthly damages from Rs.89,000 to Rs.50,000 for the period the tenant remained in possession after eviction decree, considering the tenant's status as a consumer cooperative society.

4 Mar 2020

The dispute arose from a lease agreement dated 09.07.1980 between the plaintiff-landlord (respondent) and the defendant-tenant (appellant), a District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Breach of Consent Order in Property Dispute. Court holds that undertaking to vacate premises by a specified date does not constitute an unequivocal undertaking to the court, and breach of a consent term does not automatically amount to civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

31 Oct 2018

The Petitioner, Mr. Swaranjeet Singh, filed a contempt petition alleging breach of a consent order and an undertaking given to the court in Suit No.25...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Lease vs. Licence Dispute — Agreement Dated 1st March 1977 Held to Create Licence, Not Lease. Court Interprets Clauses of Agreement to Determine Intention of Parties, Finding No Transfer of Interest in Property.

28 Feb 2014

The dispute in this second appeal arises from a suit filed by the appellant, Prakash Ganesh Lotlikar, against the respondent, Joel Avelino Noronha, se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds MHADA's Order for Repairs and Redevelopment of Cessed Building Under Section 95A of MHADA Act. Court Directs Tenants to Pay Increased Rent and Vacate for Redevelopment, Rejecting Challenge to Executive Engineer's Order.

4 Jul 2012

The appellants, eight tenants of a cessed building in Chittaranjan Nagar, Ghatkopar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 24 April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Revision in Eviction Case Based on Non-User — Tenant's Ill Health Constitutes Reasonable Cause Under Section 16(1)(n) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court held that the landlord failed to prove that the tenant's non-user of the premises was without reasonable cause, as the tenant's explanation of suffering from paralysis and heart ailment was plausible and unrebutted.

27 Apr 2012

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the landlord, Gopaldas Khushaldas Parmar, challenging the judgment and order dated 21st July 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Plaintiffs in Tenancy Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Tenancy Rights. Court holds that mere possession or payment of rent does not establish tenancy without proof of lawful transfer or succession under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

10 Jun 2011

The case involves a dispute over a room (suit premises) allotted in lieu of an earlier tenanted room in a chawl at Mahim, Mumbai. The plaintiffs, Sulo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes Contempt Petition with Direction to Vacate Premises by Stipulated Date. Contemnor Granted Time to Vacate on Furnishing Undertaking, Avoiding Contempt Finding.

7 Nov 2006

This contempt petition arose from an order dated 16/02/2000 passed by a learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 123 of 1995. The petitioner, Manuel ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Partnership Claim Fails for Lack of Registration. Relationship of landlord and tenant established by payment of rent and acceptance, not partnership.

19 Jan 2005

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment of the Additional District Judge, Nasik dated 3.10.1992, w...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)