Search Results for "supplementary agreement"

450 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 450 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by NGOs Challenging Revocation of Allotment of Gymnasium Centres by MCGM — No Right to Continue in Possession After Expiry of Licence Period

The Appellants, two NGOs, were allotted Gymnasium Centres by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on caretaker basis for fixed periods. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by NGOs Challenging Revocation of Allotment of Municipal Gymnasium Centres. Court upholds MCGM's right to revoke allotment for non-compliance with terms and public interest, rejecting claims of legitimate expectation and violation of natural justice.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two appeals filed by NGOs, Samantawadi Mahila Vikas Foundation and Mumbaikar Peace and Welfare Society, challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case for Pharmaceutical Freebies. Expenses on Gifting Freebies to Medical Practitioners Are Deductible Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as Indian Medical Council Regulations Only Prohibit Acceptance, Not Gifting, Under Explanation 1.

The dispute involved a pharmaceutical company, referred to as Apex, appealing against a High Court judgment that upheld orders disallowing part of its...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Land Procurement Dispute — Refund of Rs.91 Lakhs Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Prove Land Procurement Under MOU.

The petitioner, Manvel Tuscano, sole proprietor of M/s. Manvel Land Empire, and the respondent, DLF Limited, a real estate developer, entered into a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contractor/Developer's Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute. Court upholds award of Rs.7,35,000, Rs.10,80,000, interest, and costs under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Raviuday Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 15 May 2012 passed by a three-member ar...