APPEAL NO. 313 OF 2015
1 Dec 2016These appeals arose from a common judgment and order dated 31st March 2015 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in two proceedings: Suit ...
Search Results for "securities transactions"
592 result(s) found
Found 592 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Arbitration Petitions in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Holds That Non-Signatories Can Be Referred to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The court applied the group of companies doctrine to refer non-signatory appellants to arbitration, finding that they were closely connected to the signatory broker and the transactions were indivisible.
7 Apr 2021The case involves four appeals filed by members of the Madgavkar family (Anil V. Madgavkar, Celsa A. Madgavkar, Ayesha A. Madgavkar, and Aakash A. Mad...
- 56
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
4 Dec 2019The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...
- 200
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Interim Application in Share Dispute — Appointment of Arbitrator and Injunction Granted. Court holds that disputes regarding share transfer and oppression are arbitrable and appoints arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Kantilal Chhaganlal Securities Pvt. Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...
- 167
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.
11 Nov 2021The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...
- 228
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case — Assessing Officer's Order Not Erroneous Under Section 263. Commissioner Cannot Substitute View Where Assessing Officer Applied Mind and Took Plausible View on Depreciation of Current Investments by Bank.
26 Feb 2010The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 15 January 200...
- 53
High Court
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Discharge in Bank Fraud Case — Petitioner, a General Manager of a Cooperative Bank, Allegedly Violated RBI Guidelines by Investing in Non-SLR Securities Through a Broker, Causing Loss to the Bank.
28 Jun 2019The petitioner, Kishore Deshpande, was the General Manager of CKP Co-operative Bank Ltd. and was arraigned as accused No.5 in FIR No. RC 8/E/2010 regi...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Assessees in Interest Tax Act Case on Hire-Purchase Instalments. Hire-purchase agreements are distinct from loans, and interest component in instalments is not taxable under Section 2(7) of the Interest-Tax Act, 1974, as it does not constitute interest on loans and advances.
3 Jan 2023The dispute involved a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax liability of non-banking finance and leasing companies under the Interest-Tax Act, 19...
- 282
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Limitation and Acknowledgment of Debt. Defendant's Application for Leave to Defend Allowed Subject to Deposit of 50% of Suit Amount Under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of CPC, 1908.
23 Feb 2021The plaintiffs, Carl Pinto De Andrade and others, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Ventura Securities Limited for recovery of Rs. 1,00,00,000/-...
- 56
