COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.10 OF 2024
2 May 2025...
Search Results for "section 24(2)"
512 result(s) found
Found 512 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Grants Bail to Appellant in Crypto Currency Economic Offence Case — Explains Scope of Section 437(6) CrPC. Right to bail under Section 437(6) is not indefeasible; Magistrate retains discretion to refuse bail by recording reasons, but application must be considered liberally where delay is not attributable to accused.
24 Feb 2025The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the denial of regular bail by the Chhattisgarh High Court in a case involving a crypto currency economic o...
- 510
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPFO Appeal Against HMT Limited in Provident Fund Dues Recovery Case — Establishes That Public Sector Undertakings Are Not Exempt from EPF Act Coverage and Recovery Proceedings. The Court Held That the EPF Act Applies to All Establishments Covered Under Section 1(3) and That the Respondent's Financial Difficulties Do Not Bar Recovery of Statutory Dues.
27 Jun 2023The case involves an appeal filed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Recovery Officer of the Employees' Provident Fund Organization (...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Acquisition Notification for Petitioners' Land Due to Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971. Notification held invalid for failing to specify the particular land and for not providing opportunity of hearing before declaration of slum area.
13 Apr 2023The petitioners, Yogesh Chandulal Mehta and Suresh Chandulal Mehta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Prior Sale as Valid Despite Unregistered Deed. Subsequent Purchaser's Deed Declared Void Ab Initio Due to Notice of Earlier Sale Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
9 Jun 2022The dispute pertains to a portion of land admeasuring 1.70 hectares out of Survey No.13/1 of village Shelavli, Palghar. The plaintiffs (Respondent Nos...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal Order Under Article 311(2) Second Proviso (b) of Constitution of India — Subsequent Acquittal Does Not Revive Stale Challenge. Dismissal Order Based on Conviction Attained Finality; Petition Dismissed as Stale.
20 Mar 2018The petitioner, Satish L. Gawte, was dismissed from service by order dated 7 October 1998 under Article 311(2) second proviso (b) of the Constitution ...
- 123
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Adjustment Case — Held that ITAT Correctly Deleted Addition for Non-Compete Fee Paid to AE Without Adequate Justification. The court found no substantial question of law as the Tribunal's findings were factual and not perverse.
14 Aug 2015The Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax) filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order and Show Cause Notice Under PMLA for Lack of Reasons. Show Cause Notice Under Section 8(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Must Contain Reasons for Belief of Offence Under Section 3 or Possession of Proceeds of Crime.
20 Jun 2014The petitioner, Brizo Reality Company Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking to quash a provisional attachment order da...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Amendment to Section 17 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869 Ousting Confirmation Requirement is Retrospective — Reference for Confirmation of Dissolution Decree Renders Infructuous. The amendment deleting the requirement of High Court confirmation of dissolution decrees applies to pending matters, making the reference infructuous.
9 May 2014The case involves a First Appeal and a Reference arising from a matrimonial dispute under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The appellant, Sou. Kamal w/o ...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement Despite Trial Commencement — Liberal Approach Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. Amendment Sought to Incorporate Alternative Plea of Ownership Based on Adverse Possession Not Barred by Delay or Lack of Due Diligence.
22 Oct 2013The petitioners, who were defendants in Regular Civil Suit No. 242/2007, filed an application (Exh. 42) for amendment of their written statement. The ...
- 87
