Search Results for "salary difference"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "salary difference"

597 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 597 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.

3 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Shikshan Sevaks Under M.E.P.S. Act — Termination Upheld as Automatic Upon Completion of Three-Year Tenure Without Requisite Qualification. The court held that the termination of Shikshan Sevaks who failed to acquire the prescribed qualification within three years is automatic by operation of law under Section 5 of the M.E.P.S. Act and Rule 9(8)(a) of the M.E.P.S. Rules, and no separate termination order is required.

21 Sep 2022

The petitioners, members of Swabhimani Shikshak Va Shikshaketar Sanghatana and other individuals, were appointed as Shikshan Sevaks (probationary teac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Rights in Provident Fund Pension Scheme by Quashing Arbitrary Amendments. High Court's decision setting aside 2014 amendments to Employees' Pension Scheme as arbitrary and violative of Article 14 is considered, with reliance on R.C. Gupta holding no cut-off date for joint option under Clause 11(3).

24 Aug 2021

The dispute involved the Employees Provident Fund Organisation and employees regarding the interpretation of the Employees' Pension Scheme, particular...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Contributory Negligence Finding and Inadequate Compensation. The Court held that a passenger cannot be held guilty of contributory negligence merely because the bus driver was negligent, and applied correct multiplier and deductions as per settled law.

11 Sep 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 25.3.1997 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Satara in MACP No.414 of 1992. The appellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Parity for Grampanchayat Employees with State Government Employees. Grampanchayat Employees Not Entitled to Same Benefits as State Government Employees Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

9 May 2014

The petitioners, Maharashtra Rajya Grampanchayat Karmachari Mahasangh, a registered union of Grampanchayat employees, filed a writ petition seeking di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Teacher for Pension as Trained Teacher - Petitioner's Appointment as Trained Teacher Approved and Confirmed, Entitled to Pension in Trained Scale

15 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Mrs. Charumathi Kannappa Mudaliar, was appointed as an Assistant Trained Teacher at respondent No.4 School, a recognized and aided sch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Reference of Minimum Wages Dispute to Industrial Tribunal. Settlement Barring Financial Demands Does Not Preclude Statutory Minimum Wages Claim Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

20 Sep 2011

The petitioner, Pix Transmissions Limited, an employer, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

21 Feb 2011

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Granting Wage Difference to Employee Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer's Failure to Lead Evidence Results in Adverse Inference.

11 Sep 2006

The petitioner, the Dairy Manager of Government Milk Scheme, Gondia, challenged the orders passed by the Labour Court, Bhandara, in proceedings under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Deputy Manager in Indian Airlines Case Due to Lapsed Regulations and Violation of Natural Justice. Regulation 13 of Indian Airlines Service Regulations Held Void for Absence of Enquiry and Principles of Natural Justice.

30 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Prabha D. Kannan, a former Deputy Manager (In Flight Services) of Indian Airlines Ltd., challenged her termination from service by an ...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)