Search Results for "retiral benefits"

448 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 448 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Directs State to Consider Promotion of Retired Employee After Exoneration in Disciplinary Enquiries. The Court held that since no disciplinary enquiry is pending and the petitioner has been exonerated, the State must consider his promotion as per DPC decisions of 1996.

The petitioner, F H Shaikh, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the State of Gujar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partially Allows Workman's Petition in Industrial Dispute — Directs Reinstatement with 30% Back Wages and Continuity of Service. Labour Court's denial of full back wages set aside as employer failed to prove gainful employment under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Dhirabhai Lalabhai Sangada, was a workman employed by the Deputy Executive Engineer (respondent). He was terminated from service, lead...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Assistant Teacher Seeking Extension of Service Beyond 58 Years and 7th Pay Commission Benefits. Employee Born on 1st of Month Retires on Last Day of Preceding Month Under Rule 17 of MEPS Rules, 1981.

The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher born on 01.01.1958, was superannuated on 31.12.2015 upon completing 58 years of age. He contended that he should ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Counting Past Contractual Service as Qualifying Service for Pensionary Benefits. Petitioner's service as Gramsevak on contractual basis prior to regular appointment as Senior Assistant is directed to be counted for pension and other retiral benefits.

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar s/o Laxmanrao Kedare, was initially appointed as Gramsevak on a contractual basis by the District Selection Committee on 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Employee Retired Prematurely Based on Deemed Age — Resolution Cannot Override Service Rules. The Court held that the Board's resolution deeming age as 18 on appointment date could not reduce the actual retirement age under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code.

The appellant, Gopal Prasad, was appointed as Calligraphist-cum-Assistant of the Bihar School Examination Board on 20 May 1970 at about 15½ years of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Employees of Sheltered Workshop for Handicapped - Government Resolution of 1984 Extended to Workshop Employees

The petitioners, employees of the Sheltered Workshop Section of Home for Aged and Handicapped, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Employee Seeking Pensionary Benefits. Confirms that Continuity of Service Awarded by Labour Court Entities Employee to Count Entire Service Period for Pension.

The petitioner, Dattatraya Laxman Rakh, was appointed as a Peon with the Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education on 15 Nov...