Search Results for "redevelopment scheme challenge"

306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 37(1AA) of MRTP Act in Constitutional Validity Case. Court Holds That State's Power to Modify Development Plans Does Not Violate 74th Amendment or Article 243W.

The petitioners, residents of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator by Developer. Appointment of Arbitrator Without Mutual Consent Held Invalid Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, a proposed cooperative housing society and its members, entered into a development agreement with the respondent, a developer, for re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction on Municipal School Land — No Violation Found in Grant of IOD and Occupation Certificate. Court held that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality in the construction or deviation from sanctioned plans, and the PIL was dismissed with costs.

The petitioner, Sanjay Krishna Chavan, claiming to be an RTI activist and social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MCGM to Consider New Building Proposal Application Under Section 44 of MRTP Act on Merits. The court held that each application must be decided independently and the MCGM cannot refuse to consider a fresh application based on earlier rejections.

The petitioners, Kaalkaa Real Estates Private Limited and its director Kanta Ramchandra Rane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petitions Challenging MHADA's Cancellation of Police Housing Lease — Allotment Under Slum Rehabilitation Scheme at Gaikwad Nagar Questioned

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two connected writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Acquisition Notification for Petitioners' Land Due to Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971. Notification held invalid for failing to specify the particular land and for not providing opportunity of hearing before declaration of slum area.

The petitioners, Yogesh Chandulal Mehta and Suresh Chandulal Mehta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Application Under MOFA — Holds That Competent Authority Cannot Reject Application on Grounds of Missing Documents After Issuing Notice, and That Lack of Occupation Certificate Is Not a Bar to Grant of Deemed Conveyance.

The petitioner, ALJ Residency Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order in Slum Rehabilitation Project — Petitioner's Right to Hearing Not Violated as Adjournment Sought on Ground of Illness Not Supported by Medical Certificate.

The petitioner, Madhukar Shankar Parsekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challengi...