Search Results for "prohibited place"

1914 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1914 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Rules on Motor Vehicle Alteration Over Central Prototype Norms. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules permit structural alterations with registering authority's approval, overriding Central Motor Vehicle Rules' restriction on deviation from prototype test.

The case involved a conflict of judicial opinion in the Kerala High Court regarding the permissibility of structural alterations to motor vehicles tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.

The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutionality of National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, in Malegaon Blast Case. Petitioners Challenged Legislative Competence and Transfer of Investigation Without State Consent, Arguing Encroachment on State Police Powers.

The matter arose from two criminal writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of the National Investigation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Petition Due to Pre-Existing Dispute and Section 10A Bar. Operational Creditor's Claim Time-Barred and Default Occurred During Prohibited Period Under IBC.

The appeal was filed by Royal Construction (Operational Creditor) against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which dismisse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Copyright Injunction Against Music Streaming Service in Interpretation of Section 31D of Copyright Act, 1957. The court held that a statutory license under Section 31D for radio broadcasting does not extend to internet streaming services like Wynk Music.

The case involves two appeals by Wynk Ltd and Bharti Airtel Ltd (defendants) against an order of the Bombay High Court (SJ Kathawalla J) dated 23rd Ap...