Search Results for "postal delay"

242 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 242 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 376, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3(a)/4, 5(i),(j)(ii),(l)/6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sameer Shashikant Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Special Case No.19/2018 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Reverses First Appellate Court's Dismissal on Limitation and Order II Rule 2 CPC. Time was not of essence of contract and suit was not barred by limitation or res judicata.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Special Civil Suit No. 51 of 1989 for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Despite Handwriting Expert Opinion — Accused's Failure to Enter Witness Box and Explain Cheque Possession Proves Fatal

The appeal arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed by T.N. Channakeshava (respondent) against M. Abbas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Food Adulteration Case Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial Compliance of Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Sufficient When No Prejudice Caused.

The appellant Vijendra was convicted under Section 7(1)/16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated buffalo m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Produce Original Document in Suit for Specific Performance — Court Holds That Production of Original Agreement Is Necessary for Adjudication of Rights Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original defendant Sharad, challenged an order dated 20/2/2012 passed by the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Divisio...