Search Results for "police inspector revision"

685 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 685 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision and Quash Petitions in Corruption Case Against RTO Officials. Prima Facie Case Exists Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Based on Trap and Recovery of Bribe.

The judgment pertains to two connected petitions arising from Special Case No.35/2015 pending before the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Section 187 MV Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Dyaniyal S/o Malku Army, was convicted by the Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Humnabad in C.C. No. 309/2019 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Rash Driving Case — Confirms Sentence for Causing Grievous Hurt. Court holds that evidence of injured witnesses and mechanical inspection report sufficiently established rash and negligent driving under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC.

The petitioner, Firoz Mohammed Ali Aga, was the driver of a mini bus (registration no. GA-02/T-4897) that met with an accident on 05/03/2010 near Vadd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive and Last Seen Theory.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions filed by Nagaraju and Devaraju, who were accused Nos.1 and 2 respectively, challenging their convict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ramesh Sonawane, was an Assistant Sub-Inspector at a police chowki in Government Medical College Hospital, Aurangabad. He was convicted...