Search Results for "penalty waiver"

243 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 243 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dismissal Order Based on Flawed Lokayukta Inquiry — Petitioner's Dismissal Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that an inquiry without opportunity of hearing is invalid and the consequential dismissal order cannot stand.

The petitioner, Sri B. Neelakant, was an employee of the Dharwad, Haveri, Gadag and Uttara Kannada Districts Co-operative Milk Producers Societies Uni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging EPF Order Due to Non-Functional Appellate Tribunal. Alternate remedy under Section 7I of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 not a bar when tribunal is vacant.

The petitioner, HVPM's Degree College of Physical Education, Amravati, through its Secretary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging APMC Market Fee Exemption for Farmers. Exemption notification under Section 63 of Karnataka APMC Act, 1966 held valid and not violative of Article 14.

The petitioners, who are traders and commission agents in the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) yard at Tiptur, filed a Public Interest Lit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Debarment of Retired CCI Officials from Legal Practice — No Cause of Action or Public Interest Established. Petition fails to demonstrate any legal right or public injury warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Dr. Savio Pereira, filed a writ petition purportedly as a public interest litigation before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Debarment of Retired CCI Officials from Legal Practice. Petition lacks bonafide public interest and is motivated by personal vendetta.

The petitioner, Dr. Savio Pereira, filed a writ petition purportedly as a public interest litigation before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Deputy Chief Minister Post as Unconstitutional. The court held that the designation of Deputy Chief Minister is not unconstitutional and is a matter of political expediency within the executive's discretion.

The petitioner, Dr. Sekhar S. Iyer, a professor of Business Law and Management and a director at Vivekananda College, filed a public interest litigati...