Search Results for "order allowing counter claim"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "order allowing counter claim"

862 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 862 result(s)

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Commercial Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Injunction Granted Without Considering Balance of Convenience and Irreparable Injury Set Aside. The court held that an interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC requires satisfaction of all three principles: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury.

22 Mar 2021

The appellants, owners of a property, entered into a development agreement with the respondent developer. Disputes arose, and the respondent filed an ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Bar of Limitation — Claim Under Section 7 IBC Held Time-Barred as Debt Arose Before 2006 and Application Filed in 2018. The court held that the Limitation Act applies to IBC proceedings and the application was filed beyond three years from the date of default.

2 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Radha Exports (India) Pvt. Limited against the judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribun...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Employee Not Entitled to Salary for Period of Unauthorised Absence Despite Subsequent Quashing of Termination Order.

1 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Chief Regional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited against a judgment of the Allahabad High ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Insurance Company Service Dispute — No Work No Pay Principle Applied for Period After Punishment Order. Setting Aside of Termination Order Does Not Automatically Entitle Employee to Back Wages; Employee Must Show Willingness to Work.

1 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by United India Insurance Company against a High Court order directing payment of salary to the respondent, Sir...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claim Under Section 163A M.V. Act on Ground of Contributory Negligence. Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Structured Formula Without Proof of Negligence.

5 Nov 2018

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the wife and children of the deceased Shantaram, challenging the judgment and award dated 12.07.2012 passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor. The Court held that payment accepted under protest does not amount to accord and satisfaction, and an exclusion clause cannot bar claims for damages caused by the employer's own breach under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Sep 2017

The case arises from a construction contract between Vilayati Ram Mittal (P) Ltd. (the claimant/appellant) and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI/responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Air India Agents in Criminal Breach of Trust Case — Dispute Held to Be Purely Civil in Nature. Court finds that allegations of misappropriation of ticket sales proceeds do not constitute criminal offences under Sections 403, 405, 409, 420, 425 IPC as the relationship between the parties is contractual and the dispute is civil.

20 Jun 2017

The petitioners, Nilesh N. Shah and Hema N. Shah, were partners of a partnership firm engaged in the business of selling air tickets. Air India Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction in Collision Case — Cause of Action in Goa, Not Bombay. Vessel Registration Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction Under Section 6 CPC and Letters Patent.

18 Mar 2015

The plaintiffs, V.M. Salgaocar & Bros. Ltd., filed an admiralty suit in the Bombay High Court claiming damages of Rs.13,33,70,000/- with interest for ...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)