Search Results for "judicial inquiry"

3886 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3886 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Sentence Modification in Court-Martial Case. General Court Martial Composition Violated Army Rules, 1954, Rule 40(2) and Rule 102, but Armed Forces Tribunal's Sentencing Discretion Under Section 71(e) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Upheld.

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a retired Lieutenant General of the Indian Army, initiated after an anonymous complaint in 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Port Authority's Decision to Remove Employee on Disproportionate Penalty Grounds. The Court examines whether the disciplinary authority violated principles of natural justice and statutory procedure under MPE Regulations, 1964.

The petitioner, a Hindi Translator with the Mormugao Port Trust, faced disciplinary action culminating in his removal from service on 30.4.2011. He wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Power to Set Aside Termination but Remands for Fresh Enquiry in Teacher Misconduct Case. Management's Challenge to Tribunal's Order Partly Allowed; Teacher's Cross-Petition for Reinstatement Dismissed.

The judgment arises from two cross-petitions: one by the management (Shri A.P.D. Jain Pathshala and Walchand College of Arts & Science) challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of CISF Constable for Misconduct — Penalty Modified from Removal to Compulsory Retirement with Full Pensionary Benefits. Appellate Authority's Lenient View Upheld as Disciplinary Authority's Order Was Not Shown to Be Per Se Unreasonable or Disproportionate.

The petitioner, a constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), was subjected to disciplinary proceedings and was removed from service by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Declares Accused Juvenile and Quashes Death Sentence Under Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. Age Determination Based on School Birth Certificate Prevails Over Ossification Test, Leading to Release After Over 5 Years Incarceration as Maximum Sentence for Juvenile Below 16 is 3 Years.

The Supreme Court heard appeals challenging the judgment and order dated 15.11.2018 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which affirmed the death sentenc...