Search Results for "income tax penalty"

553 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 553 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 143(2) Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit in Income Tax Reassessment — Notice Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Is Invalid.

The petitioner, AMNS Khopoli Limited (formerly Uttam Galva Steels Limited), challenged a notice dated 31st May 2023 issued by the Assistant Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Income Tax Case. ITSC's order under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as valid and not perverse.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – II, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31st July 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid When Based on Same Material Considered in Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Shivam Ispat Private Limited, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 2016-2017 declaring total income of Rs.32,58,510/-. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Income Tax Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years.

The petitioners, Sanjeevkumar Kabra and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 234E of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Levy of Fee for Late Filing of TDS Returns is Valid. The Court held that the fee under Section 234E is compensatory in nature and not a penalty, and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, a practising Chartered Accountant and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the co...