Search Results for "gold clause"

498 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 498 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Income Tax Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years.

The petitioners, Sanjeevkumar Kabra and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010137812018_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to FIR Against Income Tax Officials: Sections 138 and 293 Income Tax Act Protection Argued. Court Examines Whether Notice Under Section 91 Cr.P.C. Can Override Statutory Safeguards in Search and Seizure Cases.

The writ petition was filed by income tax authorities under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider vital documents and exhibited casual approach.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Siraz Mohammed Sayyed, challenged a detention order dated 10 July 2015 passed under Sections 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(i...