ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026
17 Jul 2026The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...
Search Results for "family members presence"
2450 result(s) found
Found 2450 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Gang-Related Assault Case. Court Confirms Life Imprisonment Under Section 302 IPC for Fatal Stabbing and 10 Years Under Section 307 IPC for Injuring Victim, Based on Credible Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.
11 Jun 2024The case arises from an incident on 22nd March 2011, where the deceased Suraj @ Balu Shabbir Magdum and injured Rohan Sakate (PW-3) were assaulted by ...
- 452
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Non-Service of Requisition Copy Under Rule 2(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch (No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1975 is Directory and Does Not Invalidate Motion When Sarpanch Had Notice and Participated.
28 Feb 2025The Petitioner, Priyanka Abhijeet Deodhare, was the Sarpanch of Village Kaddhe, Taluka Khed, District Pune. Elections to the Gram Panchayat were held ...
- 398
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Appeal by Accused Convicted under Section 302 IPC for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Trial Court Convicted the Accused Based on 12 Circumstances Including Extrajudicial Confessions and Discovery of Dead Body.
28 Feb 2012The appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 02/09/2009 by the Additional Sessions Judge-I, South Goa, Margao in Sessions Case No.6/2008 convict...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Based on Child Witness and Circumstantial Evidence. Section 106 of Evidence Act Shifts Burden on Husband for Wife's Death in Matrimonial Home.
3 Mar 2025The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the acquittal of Balveer Singh by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The case involved the murder of Biren...
- 1754
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Rioting and Public Property Damage Case Due to Flawed Test Identification Parade. Conviction under Sections 143, 147, 148 IPC and Section 3(2)(e) of Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984 set aside as TIP was vitiated by accused being shown to witnesses while in custody.
11 Nov 2022The case arises from a protest on 12 July 2000 against the State of Kerala's decision to delink pre-degree courses from colleges. The next day, a mob ...
- 114
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder and Arms Act Case Based on Reliable Evidence and Forensic Confirmation. Life Sentence Imposed Under Section 302 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act Sustained as Lower Courts Properly Assessed Eyewitness Testimonies and Forensic Reports Despite Procedural Issues.
4 Feb 2022The appeals arose from a High Court judgment convicting the appellants for life under Section 302 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, while acquitting...
- 309
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 120B r/w 302 IPC. Conviction Stemmed from Alleged Conspiracy to Murder Inder Bhatija by Accused No.1 and Others.
14 Oct 2014The appeal arose from the conviction and sentence of accused No.1 Pappu @ Suresh Budharmal Kalani by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Sessions...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Appeals Against Convictions in Honour Killing Case Involving Inter-Caste Marriage. Multiple Accused Challenged Convictions Under Sections 302/149 IPC and SC/ST Act Provisions for Murder and Atrocities Against Dalit Victim.
28 Apr 2025The Supreme Court considered appeals challenging the Madras High Court's judgment dated 08.06.2022, which had modified convictions and sentences in a ...
- 379
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.
10 May 2019The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...
- 312
