Search Results for "concession withdrawal"

233 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 233 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Scope of Order XLI Rule 22 CPC in Second Appeal. Conditional Readiness to Perform Contract Held Not Sufficient; Respondent Cannot Challenge Adverse Finding Without Cross-Objection.

The case originated from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 17 August 1973 concerning immovable property. The plaintiff, V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Electricity Board's Appeals in Illegal Disconnection Case — Board Cannot Claim Charges for Period of Its Own Wrongful Act. Initial Disconnection Without Considering Consumer's Instalment Request Violates Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Bihar State Electricity Board (appellant) and M/s Iceberg Industries Ltd. (respondent/company) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Intra-Court Appeal Against Look-Out Circulars Issued by Banks Due to Default of Rs.2800 Crores. Court Holds that Petitioner’s Concession to Banks’ Power and Pending Suits Justify Travel Restriction Under Office Memoranda.

The intra-court appeal arose from the dismissal of a writ petition that challenged two Look Out Circulars issued by Bank of Baroda and Punjab National...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Abolition of Post and Punishment Orders in Service Dispute. Employer's Prerogative to Abolish Post Upheld Unless Mala Fides Proven, and Disciplinary Actions Found Consistent with Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Jitendra Srivastava, was appointed as Joint Director (Administration) by the second respondent to manage personnel, administration, fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Multiparty Dispute Over Land Ownership and Compensation Under Inam Abolition Act. Privy Council Declaration of Inam Title and Forest Management Agreement Form Core of Dispute Over 157‑Acre Property Transferred to CIDCO Without Acquisition.

The dispute concerned a large parcel of land bearing Survey No. 51/0 at Ulwe, Raigad, originally granted in 1816. The Bivalkars claimed ownership thro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Forest Guards in Promotion Dispute — Circular Revocation Invalid Without Proper Rescission. State Government's Order Dated 14.05.2009 Did Not Revoke Earlier Circular of 17.10.1977; Subsequent Revocation Order Dated 11.06.2012 Was Not Given Retrospective Effect.

The case involves two appeals by Forest Guards, Omkar Sinha and another, against the State of Chhattisgarh and others, concerning their entitlement to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Pension Grant to Scheme Employees Under Uttar Pradesh Cane Service Rules. Employees of Antar Gramin Sadak Nirman Yojana Held Entitled to Pension and Retiral Benefits as Per Government Decisions and Precedent in Vinod Kumar Goel.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) dated 18.05.2016, which held that employees appointed under the Antar Gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Order of Reinstatement and Back Wages for Unfair Termination of Junior Clerk. Termination Order Set Aside as Management Failed to Prove Misconduct and Violated Principles of Natural Justice.

The Progressive Education Society and another (petitioners) challenged the judgment and order dated 11th August, 2000 passed by the learned Presiding ...