Search Results for "composite premises"

336 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 336 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No Substantial Question of Law Found Under Section 100 CPC Regarding Will Validity and Adverse Possession.

The case involves a property dispute among family members. The original plaintiff, Indumati Anantrao Naik (since deceased and represented by legal rep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in High Seas Sales Dispute. Court Examines Whether Claim Based on Dishonoured Cheques Can Be Defeated by Ex Turpi Causa Defence Under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The dispute arose from high seas sales of raw materials and pharmaceutical drugs. The Respondent, as vendor, had filed a summary suit for recovery of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.

This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal Against Quashing of Acquisition of Part of Building Without Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court Held That Acquisition of a Portion of a Building Without Acquiring the Land Beneath It is Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common judgment of the High Court dated 10.3.2006 in two writ petitions filed by Reliance Industries Ltd. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Royalty and Advance Tax Case — Payments for Equipment and Spare Parts Not Taxable as Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. No Advance Tax Liability When Entire Income Subject to TDS.

The Revenue filed five appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumb...