Search Results for "compensation under protest"

454 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 454 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Disposal of Section 28A Applications Despite Pending Appeals in Land Acquisition Case. Landowners' Applications for Redetermination of Compensation Cannot Be Kept Pending Solely Due to Pendency of State's Appeals Against Reference Court Award.

The petitioners were owners of lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. An award under Section 11 was made in 1988. In 1999, they filed ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition by Debenture Trustee Seeking Deposit and Injunction — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief as Trustee Failed to Establish Breach of Trust or Impairment of Security Under Trust Deed and Information Memorandum.

The petitioner, IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim rel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Both Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Reference Court's Award Upheld. Claimant's Enhancement Claim Rejected as Sale Deed of Small Plot Not Comparable; Acquiring Body's Challenge Also Fails.

The case involves two appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for the Masalga Medium Project. The claimant, Dasrao Yadavrao Marure, owned l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears and Decides Batch of Appeals Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Regarding Compensation for Kakhandaki Village Lands. The Court Examined Market Value Determinations Made by the Reference Court Under Sections 18 and 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

Background: A batch of appeals and cross objections were filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 189...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order Against Public Servants in Private Complaint for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 PC Act. Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servants is Mandatory for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duty.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions filed by the petitioners (accused No.2, 3 and 4) challenging the order dated 13.4.2012 passed by the...