Search Results for "civil dispute versus criminal"

2369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maintainability of Civil Suit Challenging MRTP Act Notice — Preliminary Issue Under Section 9A CPC Decided in Favor of Plaintiff. Court holds that bar under Section 149 of MRTP Act does not apply to notices under Section 53(1) of the Act.

The petitioner, Prathamesh Tower Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged an order passed by the trial court on a preliminary issue under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Section 34 Applications Under Arbitration Act from District Court to High Court for Consolidated Hearing. Transfer Ordered Under Section 24 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Conflicting Decisions in Arbitration Matters.

The applicant, Atlanta Limited, a public limited company, filed this application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Amendment to Section 26 of Bombay Civil Courts Act Prospective, Not Applicable to Pending Appeals. Amendment increasing pecuniary jurisdiction of District Court from Rs.1 lakh to Rs.5 lakh does not apply to appeals already filed before the amendment came into force.

The Bombay High Court considered a reference arising from a learned Single Judge's order dated 4 March 2011, which formulated two questions regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Non-Impleadment of Company. Vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires specific averments and company must be made accused.

The petitioners, Harry Inder Dhaul, Narayan Singh Pathania, and Mikhail s/o Harry Dhaul, were directors of Siddhayu Ayurvedic Research Foundation Priv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Chamber Summons Seeking to Set Aside Consent Terms in Arbitration Petition — Consent Terms Recorded by Court Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicants, original respondent nos.1 to 5, filed Chamber Summons No.905 of 2013 in Letters Patent Petition No.226 of 2013 and Arbitration Petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Injunction in Non-Compete Clause Dispute. Temporary Injunction Granted to Restrain Former Employee from Competing with Employer for Three Years Based on Contractual Non-Compete Agreement.

The petitioner, Tapas Kanti Mandal, was employed by Cosmo Films Ltd. as a manager in its Research and Development Department from May 2003. He resigne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...