KAHC010026042017_1
9 Mar 2018...
Search Results for "central store office"
257 result(s) found
Found 257 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Petition, Directs Appellate Authorities to Pass Speaking Orders in Parole and Furlough Matters. The court held that appellate orders rejecting furlough or parole must be reasoned to enable judicial review, and set aside a cryptic order rejecting the petitioner's furlough appeal.
1 Mar 2019The petitioner, Mohammed Majid Mohammed Shafi, a convict under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, lodged in Amravati Central Pr...
- 51
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions and Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Assistant Engineers in Recruitment Scam Case. The Court upheld the termination orders as valid exercise of liberty granted earlier, finding no contempt or violation of natural justice, based on investigation reports indicating corruption in the selection process.
3 Jun 2021The dispute arose from the termination and subsequent re-engagement of Assistant Engineers appointed by Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam through a recruitment ...
- 243
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of Delay in Gratuity Appeal — Delay Beyond 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Section 7(7) First Proviso Imposes Absolute Bar on Entertaining Appeal Filed After 120 Days from Receipt of Controlling Authority's Order.
5 Oct 2015The petitioner, Changunabai Sambhaji Gaware, a retired employee, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court dated 18.11.2014,...
- 102
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Hotels and Restaurants. Sub-clauses (ZZZZV) and (ZZZZW) of Section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2011 held to be within legislative competence of Parliament.
3 Nov 2014The case involves three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court. The petitioners ...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Reasons for Belief and Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.
19 Sep 2006The appellant, Mohd. Akram Mohd. Majij Shaikh, was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Special ...
- 119
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Levy of Market Fees on Vanaspati as Edible Oil Under Maharashtra APMC Act. Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil Held to Fall Within 'Edible Oils' Entry Added by 1987 Notification; Levy of Fees and Supervision Charges Upheld.
16 Jun 2006Two writ petitions were filed by companies manufacturing Vanaspati, challenging the levy of market fees and supervision charges by the Mumbai Agricult...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.
1 Jan 2026The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...
- 198
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.
13 Sep 2019The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...
- 140
