Search Results for "building contractor"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "building contractor"

754 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 754 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in MOU Dispute Between Developer and Public Trust. Arbitration Clause in MOU dated 16 June 2011 Held Valid and Binding Despite Non-Formation of Special Purpose Entity.

12 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Devike Constructions and Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Despite Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Notice Period. The court held that the respondent's failure to respond to the notice and its conduct constituted waiver of the 30-day notice requirement under Clause 64(3)(b)(ii) of the Indian Railways Standard General Conditions of Contract.

3 Apr 2024

The applicant, S. N. Naik & Brothers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with the Union of India (respondent) on 23.09.2019 for constructi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals and Dismisses Assessees' Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Case — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of CGST Act. Court holds that denial of ITC on construction of immovable property used for renting is valid and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A.

3 Oct 2024

The case involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the Central Goods and Services...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Petition in Property Tax Dispute with State Government. Government land leased to private contractor for toll bridge construction is exempt from municipal property tax under Section 127 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

12 Apr 2005

The case involves a dispute between the Commissioner of Sangli Miraj Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation (petitioner) and the Executive Engineer of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to MoEF Direction for Demolition of Compound Wall in CRZ Area — Non-Compliance with Environmental Clearance Conditions and Environment Protection Act, 1986 Justifies Direction. Construction of Compound Wall Without Necessary Approvals in Coastal Regulation Zone Violates Environmental Regulations.

10 Jun 2016

The writ petition arose from a solid waste management project established by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai at Kanjur Marg, Mumbai. The M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workman's Petition in Part in Industrial Dispute Case — Denial of Backwages Set Aside. The Court held that the Labour Court's denial of backwages was perverse and not based on evidence, and awarded 50% backwages for the period between illegal termination and reinstatement under Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

18 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Shashikant Gangaram Narkar, was employed as an H.T. Assembler with the respondent employer, M/s. Advance Transformers & Equipments Pvt...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Contractor’s Claim for Enhanced Rates in Construction Contract Despite Limitation Defence. Suit for Enhanced Rates Held Governed by Residuary Article 120 of Limitation Act, 1908, Not by Article 56 or 115.

28 Oct 1969

The Government of India invited tenders for reinforced concrete work at Sindri Fertilizer Factory. The appellant company's tender was accepted on Nove...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Liable for Third-Party Injury Despite Vehicle Not Covered by Policy. Court holds that under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, an insurance policy must cover third-party risks, and the insurer cannot avoid liability for injuries caused by a vehicle even if the policy does not cover the specific vehicle, as the vehicle was being used in a public place.

17 Dec 2024

The appellant, Sri Munikrishna, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Partnership Firm in Railway Tender Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as No Show Cause Notice or Hearing Was Given Before Imposing 5-Year Ban. Blacklisting Without Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Is Arbitrary and Unconstitutional Under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

1 Dec 2022

The petitioners, Krishi Infratech (a registered partnership firm) and its partner M. Suryanarayana Reddy, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Upholds Claims 1 and 4, Sets Aside Claims 5, 7, and 13 for Lack of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the arbitral tribunal failed to apply its mind to contractual provisions and evidence, rendering the award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The Union of India (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a majority arbitral award...

15 16 17 18 19

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)