INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 25700 OF 2025
9 Oct 2025...
Search Results for "arbitration jurisdiction"
2872 result(s) found
Found 2872 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Arbitrability of Disputes Between Developer and Non-Signatory Member of Cooperative Society Under Development Agreement. Issue Involves Permissibility of Invoking Arbitration Clause Against Dissenting Member Not Party to Agreement.
6 Mar 2026The dispute arose from the redevelopment of a cooperative society's building in Mumbai. The applicant, a developer, entered into a Development Agreeme...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Validity of Award Based on Partnership Deed and Evidence. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Dissolution and Accounts Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
10 Jul 2026The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Saraf, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Family Dispute Over Partnership Deed. Arbitration Clause in Partnership Deed Found Valid and Binding on Parties Despite Allegations of Fraud and Non-Signatory Status.
6 Jul 2026The applicants, Hemant D. Shah HUF and Kokila H. Shah, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ap...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Case Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Award of Rs.1,26,46,303/- with Interest at 12% Per Annum. The court held that the arbitrator had applied his mind and there was no violation of natural justice or public policy.
23 Dec 2025The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Manmohan Bhimsen Goyal and Kavita Manmohan Goyal ...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Coal Supply Dispute Due to Absence of Arbitration Agreement in Purchase Orders. Tax Invoices with Arbitration Clause Not Binding as They Were Unilateral and Not Accepted by Respondent.
5 May 2026The applicant, Hitesh Coal Traders, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbi...
- 157
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds That Jurisdiction for Section 34 Challenge to MSMED Act Award Is Governed by Section 18(4) of MSMED Act, Not by Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Agreement. The non obstante provision in Section 18(4) overrides the arbitration agreement, and the Section 34 petition must be filed at the place where the supplier is located.
16 Oct 2024The case involves a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict between two Single Judge decisions regarding the jurisd...
- 1161
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Case — Licence Agreement Contained Valid Arbitration Clause for Disputes Arising from Termination and Recovery of Possession. The Court held that the arbitration clause survived termination and that the Commercial Court erred in refusing reference under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
23 Apr 2023The Supreme Court considered appeals against a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court dismissing First Appeals filed by the appellant against order...
- 141
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Against Partial Arbitral Awards in Koyna Hydro Electric Project Sub-Contract Dispute. Challenge to awards failing on grounds of settlement and coercion under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Jan 2016The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. (th...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows ICICI Bank's Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitral Award on Claims for Loss of Profit and Interest on Mobilization Advance. The court held that the arbitrator cannot award interest on an interest-free mobilization advance and cannot award loss of profit without evidence of actual loss.
30 Mar 2016The petitioner, ICICI Bank Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dat...
- 92
