Search Results for "allottee rights"

305 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Seizure Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal. Section 53 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Authorize Seizure of Vehicles; Principles of Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Non-Allottee Challenging LPG Distributorship Cancellation. Petitioner Not a Party to Supreme Court Proceedings, Cannot Seek Reconsideration of Allotment.

The petitioner, Rahul Ashok Sonalkar, applied for an LPG distributorship in Sangola, District Solapur, Maharashtra. Respondent No. 5 was selected and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals in Specific Performance and Permanent Injunction. Trial Court Dismissed Specific Performance Suit and Decreed Injunction; Plaintiff's Claim of Agreement to Sell and Possession Not Accepted, Subsequent Purchaser's Possession Protected.

The Regular First Appeals arose from a common judgment dated 13.09.2005 by the I Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in two suits: O....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Lease for Delay in Hotel Construction Due to Economic Slowdown and Infrastructure Delays. Extension of Time Granted Without Additional Premium Under Agreement to Lease.

The petitioners, M/s. PVP Star Hotels Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA's Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Finding of No Prima Facie Title. BDA Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Property as Revenue Records Showed Private Ownership, and No Acquisition Proceedings Were Proven.

The judgment arises from two connected Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...