Search Results for "agricultural tenancy dispute"

694 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 694 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold to Resort Held Not Agricultural Land. Land adjacent to five-star hotels with high sale price and lack of systematic cultivation fails to qualify as agricultural land under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) against the assessees, Minguel Chandra Pais and Maria Leila Tovar Furt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Land Sold to Resort Held Non-Agricultural. Land Adjacent to Five-Star Hotels with High Sale Price and Lack of Systematic Cultivation Indicates Non-Agricultural Character Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had upheld the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Exemption Certificate Under Section 88-B of Bombay Tenancy Act. Land Belonging to Public Trust Held Exempt from Tenancy Provisions as Trust Land Used for Religious and Charitable Purposes.

The petitioner, Yadu Dagadu Amrale (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Revision Due to Gross Delay. Inordinate Delay of 34 Years in Challenging Mamlatdar's Order Cannot Be Condoned Without Proper Explanation Under Tenancy Act.

The State of Gujarat, through the Deputy Collector, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated...