Search Results for "Trustee suit"

723 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 723 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction Against Dispossession. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Suit for Possession Based on Title Was Barred by Limitation.

The present First Appeal arises from a judgment of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, in S.C. Suit No.5551/1990, where the suit was decreed in favor of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Second Appeal in Eviction Case Under Transfer of Property Act, Setting Aside Decree for Forfeiture of Tenancy. Mere Denial of Derivative Title by Tenant Held Not to Constitute Forfeiture Under Section 111(g); Suit Dismissed for Lack of Rent Controller Permission.

The dispute arose from a suit for eviction filed by the respondent-landlady, who had purchased a property from a trust, against the appellant-tenants ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trust Property Dispute — Order of Temporary Injunction Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order 39 Rule 3 CPC. Court holds that ex-parte injunction granted without recording reasons or issuing notice is unsustainable.

The appellants, who were defendants in a suit filed by the respondent trust, challenged an ex-parte ad-interim order of temporary injunction granted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Probate Petition for Will of Deceased Couple Despite Caveat by Daughter-in-Law. Court holds that caveator lacks locus standi to oppose probate as she is not a legal heir under Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The petitioner, Rhea Parthasarthy, filed a petition for probate of the Will of her deceased parents, Ravi Parthasarathy and Dr. (Mrs.) Vishpala Partha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enforcement of Consent Terms Against Non-Signatory Defendant in Debenture Dispute. Interpretation of Consent Decree Held That Clause 11(a) Obligation to Pay Was Only on Defendant No.5, Not Defendant No.6, Who Was Not a Party to the Consent Terms.

The case involves two appeals filed by the original Defendant No.5 (Dewanchand Ramsaran Trading Pvt. Ltd. and others) against a common order of the le...