KAHC030020522019_1
22 Dec 2020...
Search Results for "Trade Circulars"
342 result(s) found
Found 342 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Commercial Division Considers Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Imposing Liability on Depository for Broker's Actions. The petition challenges the award's finding that CDSL must indemnify investor for breach by its depository participant despite the broker's misuse of power of attorney.
1 Dec 2025Background: The petition pertains to a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an arbitral award that held th...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Environmental Clearance for Vadhavan Port Project — Upholds Validity of CRZ Clearance and Public Hearing Process. The court held that the Dahanu Taluka Environment Protection Authority had jurisdiction to grant CRZ clearance and that the public hearing was conducted in accordance with law.
18 Apr 2024The judgment concerns two public interest litigations (PILs) filed by Conservation Action Trust and Debi Goenka, and by National Fishworkers Forum and...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Telecom Billing Dispute — Claim Barred by Section 15 of TRAI Act, 1997. Counterclaim for unpaid bills upheld with 12% interest as petitioner failed to challenge tariff orders before TRAI or Appellate Tribunal.
30 Jul 2012The petitioner, M/s. Kansan Communications Pvt. Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ch...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Bank Employees' Union; Quashes Recall Order Denying Compensation. Employees Who Opted for Voluntary Retirement Before Bank Liquidation Held Entitled to Payment as Employment Relationship Continues Until Full Settlement.
10 Mar 2017This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a trade union representing 55 employees of Solapur Nagari Audyogic Saha...
- 90
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.
5 Feb 2016Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Health Department's Petition Challenging Declaration of Unfair Labour Practice Against Temporary Employees. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that denial of permanency to employees who worked for 8-10 years as temporary workers violated Items 5, 6, and 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.
30 Jan 2020The petitioners, who are State instrumentalities including the Director of Health Services and other health department officials, filed a writ petitio...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge by SEBI Employees Association to Direct Recruitment and Deputation of Executive Directors; Holds that Section 9 of SEBI Act, 1992 Confers Unrestricted Power on Board to Appoint Officers of Its Choice, and Regulations Cannot Fetter This Power.
5 Jan 2017The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the SEBI Employees Association along with individual Chief General Managers challenging the Securities...
- 85
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Arbitration Petitions in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Holds That Non-Signatories Can Be Referred to Arbitration Under Group of Companies Doctrine. The court applied the group of companies doctrine to refer non-signatory appellants to arbitration, finding that they were closely connected to the signatory broker and the transactions were indivisible.
7 Apr 2021The case involves four appeals filed by members of the Madgavkar family (Anil V. Madgavkar, Celsa A. Madgavkar, Ayesha A. Madgavkar, and Aakash A. Mad...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of GST Registration for Non-Filing of Returns — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to File Returns and Pay Tax. Failure to file returns for six months leads to cancellation, but court holds that restoration is permissible upon compliance with conditions under Section 30 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
27 Jan 2026The petitioner, Kishore Nichani, a businessman aged 60, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, aggr...
- 208
